Recent Posts
- To Norman Brinker
- Adios
- Hold Your Line!
- Foodservice Ups its Game
- Winning at the Restaurant Game
- If We Could Save Just One Life
- Do You Know Where Your Marketers Are?
- Eat This
- Restaurant Unicorn
- Bobby Bets Big on Burgers
Recent Comments
- JBob on The Demise of Grady's
- Adame on The Worms of Spring
- 3FFPS on The Demise of Grady's
- Chef Leo Cassidy Jr. on To Norman Brinker
- John H on The Demise of Grady's
Most Commented On
- To Norman Brinker (34)
- The Demise of Grady's (33)
- Adios (20)
- I Must Be Stupid (20)
- "Is Everything Okay?" (16)
Archives
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
Blog
Wild About Wings
February 13, 2009

The forces of nature don’t always move in the same direction. If you have ever watched a waterfall, there is usually a mist that floats above the falling water. The same is true with the wind. The currents might be blowing downward, but a bird is almost always able to find an updraft to ride into the sky. Our industry is no different. When most of the casual dining concepts have comp store sales falling at different rates, there is always a concept or two that defy the trend and float above the others, seemingly oblivious to the effects of the economy. The most obvious example of levitation in the fourth quarter of 2008 was Buffalo Wild Wings, a fitting name for a high-flying concept.
Several casual dining concepts reported their fourth quarter earnings results during the week just ended. This was a messy quarter for many of the reporting companies. Many had write-offs associated with store closings or asset impairments. Asset impairment is the accounting world’s way of telling you that some of the restaurants that you own aren’t worth what you invested in them, and you must take a write-down on the income statement to adjust your balance sheet to this new reality. To look at the health of a concept or industry segment I find a quick scan of the comp sales results to be a reliable barometer.
A review of the reported fourth quarter comp sales of casual dining concepts releasing earnings this week shows the following:
- Buffalo Wild Wings +4.5% company and +2.5% franchise
- BJ’s Restaurants (.8%)
- Cheesecake Factory (7.0%)
- P.F. Chang’s China Bistro (7.1%)
- California Pizza Kitchen (7.2%)
- Grand Lux Café (8.0%)
- Kona Grill (9.4%)
Will someone please call the management team at Buffalo Wild Wings (BWLD) and let them know that we are in a deep recession? In sports terminology this performance would be called a rout. To add insult to injury, during their investor earnings call on Wednesday, BWLD let the investment community know that halfway through the first quarter of 2009 their company comp sales were running +8% and franchise restaurants +7%. Using sports terminology again, this is called running up the score.
BWLD opened 67 locations during 2008, and currently have a system of 567 units in 39 states. They increased their revenues by 33% and their earnings by 29% during the fourth quarter. These are the kind of results that good companies posted in 2005 or 2006, not 2008.
Wall Street, or what is left of it, must have liked what they heard and rewarded BWLD with a 34% increase in their stock price by the end of the day of the earnings call. This was the equivalent of a $134 million increase in the value of the company in one day. Everyone wanted to get in on the action. Normally 300,000 shares of BWLD will trade each day. On the day of the earnings release 3.9 million shares traded.

Buffalo Wild Wings has always been a strong performing company. They have done a great job of being what their core customer wants them to be: fun, affordable, and with good quality and value for the money. While other casual dining concepts are still trying to find the silver bullet that will lead to positive comp sales in a challenging environment, these guys are blasting away with an Uzi. This is a well-earned and much deserved victory by one of the industry’s most likeable management teams. Now how about taking a breather during the second quarter and take the heat off the rest of us?
Posted by Lane Cardwell on February 13, 2009 | Comments (4)
Reader Comments
at 2/15/2009 8:34:37 AM, stevej commented:
Success leaves clues; transformational times require focus and experience with a qualitative edge. Understanding how consumers eat is very important; reflecting on which concepts are showing signs of success during this challenging economic period. First QSR’s and Fast Casual and others who focus on Hand Held Foods for Immediate Consumption. These are operations are focusing on the 18 to 34 year old whose patterns and frequency levels have changed the least. These chains understand the unique balance between palate, price, pleasure and the consumer’s drive for qualitative distinctive differentiated new messaging and are on target with that message. Other chains must begin to focus on how the consumer eats, identifying distinctive differentiated food consumables, trends and dayparts to create a point of additional differentiation to drive sales. The food value proposition equilibrium for the consumer today balances; better for you, flavor, and traditional products all blended into something with a twist. In industry speak, differentiated does not mean different to the consumer it means familiar. I urge all of you to refocus on the success clues of today’s consumer for future positive results.
at 2/15/2009 11:34:36 AM, Lane commented:
Steve...you are wise beyond your considerable years. This is some of the best advice I have seen anyone offer. You are right, success does leave clues.
at 2/16/2009 5:54:53 AM, HighFlyin commented:
This was a great, simple way to clarify the basics and to get everyone to stop whining about lost sales. People are clearly eating something somewhere every day. It might as well be at our concepts. This proves it can be done. Thanks for the encouraging words.
at 2/17/2009 12:31:13 PM, Mark M commented:
Are SteveJ or Lane for hire?

















