Recent Posts
- Boston Market's two-buck chick
- Are you celebrating Christmas or the holidays?
- Change must come, but what kind of change?
- What's wrong with this picture?
- Do you want living wages with that?
- Re-allocation hurts this analyst
- Prepared meals: How dangerous are they?
- Discuss: Burgers and menu labeling
- Chipotle on "hold"
- Common spices, processed foods ... really?
Recent Comments
- cole mcnugget on Max & Erma's, Part 2
- Soul Delicious Restaurant on Will the bailout help your restaurants?
- Joseph Lee on His bank account kicked up a notch
- Bundling Works on Boston Market's two-buck chick
- Anon on Julia Stewart: Improve Employees' Lives
Most Commented On
- McDonald's "gay support" issue (30)
- Micatrotto: 'LIke a very large restaurant.' (27)
- Making Servers Pay: Cold-Hearted or cost-effective? (20)
- Same old, same old integrity (10)
- Julia Stewart: Improve Employees' Lives (9)
Archives
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
Blog
Menu price perception
March 12, 2008
A new national study from Technomic Inc., the Chicago-based market research firm, shows that a significant portion of restaurant-goers believe menu prices at full-service eateries are higher than they actually are. Technomic called it a "disconcerting finding" because it suggests that customers are already looking for ways to trim the amount of money they spend in restaurants. And this is one more excuse. Among other findings:
|
![]() |
| Could this lunch meeting do with one less? |
"They say, 'Let's not go out to eat at lunch but breakfast instead,'" he said. His proof: Menu prices climbed about 4 percent last year though overall check average grew just 2 percent, he added.
In fact, Balzer argues that casual dining's current troubles have been going on for "some time." He thinks current trends are merely indicative of "a re-definition" of the market.
"Here's something I picked up," he offered." We haven't seen business lunches [at full-service restaurants] taking much of a hit, even though you'd think businesses would be pulling back. We've been watching this for about a year, and we're now noticing a shift to smaller parties. So a businessperson doesn't have to necessarily change price points but is able to moderate the overall cost of the meal. No one ever thinks of it that way."
Posted by David Farkas on March 12, 2008 | Comments (2)
In response to: Menu price perception
Observer commented:
One would think when sales slow down, companies would encourage sales people to get out on the road which in turn would lead to more personal meals and more meals with customers. That's the rational approach, anyway. What dumb companies do is cut their sales reps T&E budgets and then wonder why sales are dropping.
In response to: Menu price perception
Steve commented:
Ron Pauls Technomic is in time and on target once again! It's easy to see why he is a true industry leader. Dave thank you.



