Recent Posts
- Boston Market's two-buck chick
- Are you celebrating Christmas or the holidays?
- Change must come, but what kind of change?
- What's wrong with this picture?
- Do you want living wages with that?
- Re-allocation hurts this analyst
- Prepared meals: How dangerous are they?
- Discuss: Burgers and menu labeling
- Chipotle on "hold"
- Common spices, processed foods ... really?
Recent Comments
- cole mcnugget on Max & Erma's, Part 2
- Soul Delicious Restaurant on Will the bailout help your restaurants?
- Joseph Lee on His bank account kicked up a notch
- Bundling Works on Boston Market's two-buck chick
- Anon on Julia Stewart: Improve Employees' Lives
Most Commented On
- McDonald's "gay support" issue (30)
- Micatrotto: 'LIke a very large restaurant.' (27)
- Making Servers Pay: Cold-Hearted or cost-effective? (20)
- Same old, same old integrity (10)
- Julia Stewart: Improve Employees' Lives (9)
Archives
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
Blog
Less is more when it comes to the new rules
February 18, 2008
Until I read Saturday's New York Times, I hadn't heard of the Obesity Society, "a leading organization of obesity doctors and scientists," notes the paper of record. In a front-page article in the business section, reporter Stephanie Saul writes that the group's in-coming president, Dr. David B. Allison, has filed a controversial affidavit with United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
It seems Dr. Allison has a beef with new menu labeling requirements New York City is imposing on chain restaurants, which take effect at the end of March. He's against them:
"In the filing, Dr. Allison argues that the new rules could backfire — whether by adding to the forbidden-fruit allure of high-calorie foods or by sending patrons away hungry enough that they will later gorge themselves even more," the paper reports.
It shouldn't surprise anyone that the Obesi
ty Society's other members scarcely share the doctor's opinion. In fact, many sharply object to it.
But before you shout, "See, I told you those rules were a dumb idea," consider that Dr. Allison may not be as objective as one might like. In addition to "advisory roles" with major food companies, he has been retained recently as a consultant by the New York Restaurant Association, a major opponent of the new measures.
I have to admit, whatever Dr. Allison's motivation is, I'm with him about eating habits. You order a salad for lunch and by 3 p.m. you're starving -- and not for more salad, either. You want something substantial, like a double-cheeseburger and fries. But how many people outside the industry can duck out for that snack? It's more likely they'll scarf down some non-nutritional item from a vending machine. Then, on the way home, they'll likely cave in again, stopping for a bite to satiate their hunger. Unless, they know there's a couple of big steaks in the fridge.
Still, I'm eager to see if waistlines or sales shrink faster once the number of calories in each menu item is prominently posted.
Posted by David Farkas on February 18, 2008 | Comments (0)


