Recent Posts
- Boston Market's two-buck chick
- Are you celebrating Christmas or the holidays?
- Change must come, but what kind of change?
- What's wrong with this picture?
- Do you want living wages with that?
- Re-allocation hurts this analyst
- Prepared meals: How dangerous are they?
- Discuss: Burgers and menu labeling
- Chipotle on "hold"
- Common spices, processed foods ... really?
Recent Comments
- cole mcnugget on Max & Erma's, Part 2
- Soul Delicious Restaurant on Will the bailout help your restaurants?
- Joseph Lee on His bank account kicked up a notch
- Bundling Works on Boston Market's two-buck chick
- Anon on Julia Stewart: Improve Employees' Lives
Most Commented On
- McDonald's "gay support" issue (30)
- Micatrotto: 'LIke a very large restaurant.' (27)
- Making Servers Pay: Cold-Hearted or cost-effective? (20)
- Same old, same old integrity (10)
- Julia Stewart: Improve Employees' Lives (9)
Archives
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
Blog
Domino’s Uh-oh
July 26, 2006
|
You’ve got to admire Domino’s Pizza CEO David Brandon. After same-store sales skidded for the second quarter in a row, a relative rarity at the giant pizza-delivery chain, the ex-University of Michigan footballer did a rare thing: He shouldered the blame.
“We see [the declines] as our responsibility,” he said flatly during a 20-minute Webcast with restaurant analysts on July 20. Like some other chain CEOs, he wasn’t claiming high energy prices or adjustable rate mortgages--now, the proverbial “macro” pressures--were to blame for the 4.9 percent deficit in Q2.
He simply blamed a lack of performance, confessing that promotions during the first six months hadn’t worked. He didn’t have much choice, really. While comp sales at rival Pizza Hut are flat, Papa John’s has had a bullish second quarter, reporting a same-store-sales gain of 4.9 percent in June.
Brandon acknowledged as much: “Congratulations to Papa John’s. They don’t seem to worry much about the economic conditions. They are doing just fine.”
In fact, a share of Papa John’s was trading hands at $32.65 as Brandon was speaking. Domino’s, meanwhile, was down $2, to $22 a share.Posted by David Farkas on July 26, 2006 | Comments (0)



David Farkas