Recent Posts
- Fewer customers, fewer undocumented aliens
- Will the bailout help your restaurants?
- The Bailout: A view from abroad
- Tell me: Is it always caveat emptor?
- Your $700 billion at work
- Where to eat on Sunday morning
- Tell me: About your Web site
- Optimism after yesterday's free-fall
- Expect the worst
- Quiz: Wear a hat
Recent Comments
- Matthew on Tell me: Is it always caveat emptor?
- bob on Tell me: Is it always caveat emptor?
- chksng19 on Tell me: Is it always caveat emptor?
- Jeff Sinelli, Founder of WHICH WICH on Tell me: What's your favorite sandwich?
- layla on Tell me: Is it always caveat emptor?
Most Commented On
- Micatrotto: 'LIke a very large restaurant.' (27)
- McDonald's "gay support" issue (26)
- Making Servers Pay: Cold-Hearted or cost-effective? (18)
- Same old, same old integrity (10)
- Tell me: Is it always caveat emptor? (8)
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
Blog
Tilman's Takeout
January 29, 2008
"It's a difficult market for funding leveraged transactions," he noted.
And not just any transaction. This one involves $1.3 billion and Landry's CEO Tilman Fertitta, who's attempting to take Landry's private. (The comment belongs to Mark Churchill of Piper Jaffray and appears in today's Houston Chronicle story about the bid.)
Fertitta, who's already owns 39 percent of his company's equity, presumably believes Landry's is worth more than its current share price -- a sum that has traveled between $32 and $14 in the past 52 weeks. As of this afternoon, shares were changing hands for $19.70 apiece, well below Fertitta's $23.50 offer.
Of course, there's no guarantee the wily executive, who has a knack for negotiating good deals (witness the Golden Nugget), will get his way, though it is tempting to consider buying a boat load of the stock. After all, $1.3 billion is a lot of dough to raise given the climate. Fertitta, however, has assured the board financing isn't a problem, promising he has the backers.
He also has believers. Analyst William Hamilton of SMH Capital, for example, wrote:
Given the real estate, we believe a competing offer is possible from a private equity firm, which could look to do a sale-leaseback. That said, we would speculate that CEO Fertitta is prepared to raise his offer should a counter bid emerge. Mr. Fertitta has advantages that favor his eventual victory in this transaction. First, his 39% ownership stake, which was boosted after last year’s buybacks, certainly gives him a nice head start. Second, the current turmoil in the credit markets has substantially raised the cost of capital, so his timing seems right. Finally, LNY’s balance sheet, as noted above, is already quite leveraged, which hampers a competing offer from using debt to take the company private. A private equity firm would have to put substantial equity into the deal.
Equity that would have also have to fund $900 million in company debt and an interest rate that recently climbed 200 basis points on Landry's senior notes after a painful refinancing. Churchill is dead on; it's an difficult time for leveraged transactions -- unless like Fertitta you already own a third of the company and know there aren't suitors in the wings.
Correction: In Chain Leader's February's cover story, "Enviromental Defense," I made an error. I said Saladworks franchised 18 units. I was off by a mile. There are 89 franchised units. Humble apologies.
Posted by David Farkas on January 29, 2008 | Comments (0)


