Recent Posts
- Chains Teens Like
- Starbucks in Recovery
- What Servers Should Never Do
- My Beef with Professor Singer
- Cheers! Drink Prices Rising
- Taking Price Is a Thing of the Past
- " ... So Bad It's Genius." Not.
- Rachel Maddow Grills Dr. Evil (aka Rick Berman)
- A Fast-Food Ban That Looks Like a Bust
- Out with the Unprofitable!
Recent Comments
- Harold Paxton on What Servers Should Never Do
- mrosa on Chains Teens Like
- oldlee on Making Servers Pay: Cold-Hearted or cost-effective?
- Gail on A Fast-Food Ban That Looks Like a Bust
- Gluten Free Way 105 on A Fast-Food Ban That Looks Like a Bust
Most Commented On
- Damn the Torpedoes in Quiznos New Ad (59)
- McDonald's "gay support" issue (34)
- Micatrotto: 'LIke a very large restaurant.' (30)
- Making Servers Pay: Cold-Hearted or cost-effective? (27)
- Red Lobster: Apparently Still off the Glenn Beck Show (17)
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- January 2006
Blog
Church's Chicken Deal is a Strong One
June 17, 2009
The recent acquisition of Church's Chicken by Friedman Fleischer and Lowe isn't likely to make a wing's worth of difference to the fast-feeder's many customers. They'll still have access to the tasty fried bird and re-hydrated mash potatoes the 1,400 unit chain serves up--largely in urban areas--thousands of times a day.
Yet it's likely to win cheers from the financial community, which has been starved for the type of M&A activity witnessed in the late '90s through '07. Of course, those were highly leveraged deals that didn't always deliver to investors.

Fists are up after Church's Chicken sold.
This one apparently did, though no one really knows for certain. Arcapita and FF&L decided not to disclose the transaction's details. So I asked an Arcapita spokesman at Bahrain headquarters to share what he could about the sale. To wit:
The sale by all accounts was quite an accomplishment, with some observers speculating FF&L paid as much as $550 million. Others simply praised the fast feeder, headquartered in Atlanta, for its ability to thrive in a tough economy. "To get a deal done in this climate says a lot about the strength of management and the PE firm," offered Atlanta-based financial strategist Jordon Krolick, who once oversaw M&A for McDonald's.
► The purchase price as reported by Reuters ("more than $300 million") was "considerably incorrect."
► Investors made two times their money.
► Arcapita paid $390 million in '04 for Church's, trimming the sum to about $289 million through sales/leaseback deals.
► Church's management remains in place.
He compared it to the deals of the recent past. "Many of those deals were bought on expectation," he said. "This one created real value given the equity that must have been involved."
Posted by David Farkas on June 17, 2009 | Comments (4)
Reader Comments
at 6/17/2009 5:31:05 PM, Earl Flynn commented:
Well, let's see. They have a fried chicken company with a product that many consider greasy and under-cooked located in mostly urban areas where unemployment has devastated the people living there. Except for the Rio Grande Valley and certain other Hispanic/minority areas this brand has not been able to cross-over to a broader customer base. The real-estate has been sold, the buildings are very old and I doubt if the very small building size will allow for any menu expansion. Yes, there is more room to grow domestically but just how much is questionable. For those who think the company will now be able to offer a pork-based product may be disappointed by the customer's acceptance of such an offering.
at 6/17/2009 5:54:14 PM, Dave commented:
Most excellent points, Earl. The chain -- or rather, its Muslim owners -- did have an issue with pork. But I don't think consumer acceptance of a pork product, if indeed it's ever offered, will be a problem. Good marketing and a tasty offering should do the trick. I don't belive FF&L haas bought a pig (ouch) in a poke, necessarily.
at 6/18/2009 11:01:28 AM, Jonn Straw commented:
And who said they has tasty chicken ? Popeye's has there chicken beat w/ their eyes closed. They buy the cheapest chicken they can find and does taste like cardboard. But it is cheap !!! You get what you pay for. Except KFC is way over priced .
at 7/6/2009 12:24:01 PM, flashplayer commented:
Perfect!

















